Search found 20 matches
- Mon May 27, 2013 10:18 pm
- Forum: Abrams Universe / Kelvin Timeline
- Topic: (Not) Following orders - SPOILER
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4369
Re: (Not) Following orders - SPOILER
I agree, you can elaborate in the wider body of work so long as it is implied in the main body.
- Mon May 27, 2013 10:17 pm
- Forum: Books / Games / General
- Topic: "Towards a Star Trek-style Replicator"
- Replies: 11
- Views: 967
Re: "Towards a Star Trek-style Replicator"
I wonder about the base materials used and the consistency of the food.
- Thu May 23, 2013 10:59 pm
- Forum: Abrams Universe / Kelvin Timeline
- Topic: STID review/discussion for those who've seen it SPOILERS!!!
- Replies: 81
- Views: 16583
Re: STID review/discussion for those who've seen it SPOILERS
Putting a body in that.... Does no one even ask questions about its size and properties?
- Thu May 23, 2013 10:48 pm
- Forum: Battlestar Galactica
- Topic: Origin of Humans in BSG Universe
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5641
Re: Origin of Humans in BSG Universe
Lazy writing.
- Thu May 23, 2013 10:47 pm
- Forum: Abrams Universe / Kelvin Timeline
- Topic: (Not) Following orders - SPOILER
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4369
Re: (Not) Following orders - SPOILER
About 1 in 6 for blood unless they all had O- blood.
- Tue May 21, 2013 12:16 am
- Forum: Science, Philosophy and Theology
- Topic: This is why I love science
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2051
Re: This is why I love science
Considering LEDs last forever and only 1 moving part I can see it lasting a few years.
- Sat May 18, 2013 8:23 pm
- Forum: Books / Games / General
- Topic: BA 6 worst Trek science errors
- Replies: 7
- Views: 901
Re: BA 6 worst Trek science errors
The barrier doesn't bother me so long as they are consistent with it.
- Fri May 17, 2013 12:23 am
- Forum: TNG
- Topic: Redo TNG in 2013
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1324
Re: Redo TNG in 2013
Marines.
- Mon May 13, 2013 11:07 pm
- Forum: Forum Community
- Topic: Cool Picture Thread
- Replies: 1711
- Views: 163468
Re: Cool Picture Thread
Teaos showed me the other day, apparently it was a cooking accident. Hand hit the stove top.
- Mon May 13, 2013 12:22 am
- Forum: ENT
- Topic: Starship = Submarine
- Replies: 35
- Views: 9372
Re: Starship = Submarine
Depends on which old ship and which modern ship you are comparing.
- Sun May 12, 2013 10:19 pm
- Forum: Abrams Universe / Kelvin Timeline
- Topic: USS Vengeance !!!SPOILERS!!!
- Replies: 111
- Views: 18310
Re: USS Vengeance
Didn't really think that was a spoiler... How do I spoil? I tried playing with it but the preview always just came up with the code showing.
- Sun May 12, 2013 10:13 pm
- Forum: Abrams Universe / Kelvin Timeline
- Topic: USS Vengeance !!!SPOILERS!!!
- Replies: 111
- Views: 18310
- Sun May 12, 2013 10:10 pm
- Forum: ENT
- Topic: Starship = Submarine
- Replies: 35
- Views: 9372
Re: Starship = Submarine
From what I have seen of accommodations in modern naval subs they are not a hell of a lot better than old naval standards.
- Sun May 12, 2013 9:44 pm
- Forum: ENT
- Topic: Starship = Submarine
- Replies: 35
- Views: 9372
Re: Starship = Submarine
So a dedicated Ambassadorial class?
- Sun May 12, 2013 8:51 pm
- Forum: TNG
- Topic: SFDebris: First Contact (episode)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 668
Re: SFDebris: First Contact (episode)
An interesting concept for an episode but I think 8 out of 10 is high. I'd give it 6, it was a okay story but didn't grab me.