McAvoy wrote:Trying to figure out the logic of this post.

Well, there's your problem.

Why- Absolutely zero reasons to make this. Thanks for stealing my answer, mikey. :P but yeah. There's no reason to make this! You can't recreate the majesty and awe of Simba being presented again! I would have said that there's no way to recreate Jeremy Irons reprising his great line from Reversal ...

Captain Seafort wrote:So, a subtype of the TR-116 then.

There is a distinction; TR-116 threads generally started, at least, with a topic.

Captain Seafort wrote:Calling Watership Down "rather violent" is a bit like calling War and Peace "rather long".

Wasn’t it?

Vic wrote:

Nutso wrote:We should be glad they don't own 'Watership Down.'

LOL, Watership Down; The True Story......make it grittier, more edgy! LOL

There were some rather violent parts in Watership Down.

Meh. Nobody bothered making the actual Scrubs funny, and it seemed to do mediocre.

Graham Kennedy wrote:Yes. Yes it does.

Ian's off on a cruise with his missus. I am babysitting his cats, the one who is largely indifferent towards people and the one who actively hates them. Fun times.

I received a similar reaction when I took my cats on a cruise and asked someone to babysit my wife.

Griffin wrote:I'd watch Scrubs on a Plane though.

With Samuel L. Jackson?

Absolutely zero reasons to make this.

Yet more evidence of my long-held theory that audiences are stupid.

It’s not actually messing with anything so much as being true to the OVA if not the manga.

I didn’t see it, but trust me - I don’t miss it at all.

Yet again, I’m forced to wonder why you’re posting a poll to ask us what your idea should be.

So, you mean if DS9 was something completely other than DS9?

IanKennedy wrote:Hong Kong Phooey!

TBF, he is the #1 super guy...