Search
Mobile Site Shops eMail Author Caption Comp Monthly Poll Sudden Death Colour Key Statistics Cookie Usage
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum

People
Jonathan
Archer
Reginald
Barclay
Julian
Bashir

Chakotay
Christine
Chapel
Pavel A.
Chekov
Pavel
Chekov
Zefram
Cochrane
Beverly
Crusher
Wesley
Crusher

Damar

Daniels

Data

Dax
Richard
Daystrom

Degra
Gul
Dukat
Michael
Eddington
Emergency
Medical Hologram
Admiral
Forrest
Elim
Garak

Gowron

Guinan
Kathryn
Janeway
Kahless the
Unforgettable

Kes
Harry
Kim
Major
Kira Nerys
James
T. Kirk
James
T. Kirk
Geordi
LaForge

Leeta

Lore
General
Martok
Travis
Mayweather
Leonard
McCoy
Leonard
H. McCoy

Morn
Admirall
Alynna Nechayev

Neelix

Nero

Nichols

Nog
Keiko
O'Brien
Miles Edward
O'Brien

Odo
Thomas
Eugene Paris

Phlox
Jean-Luc
Picard
Christopher
Pike
Doctor Katherine
Pulaski

Q

Quark
Janice
Rand
Malcolm
Reed
William
T. Riker

Rom
Alexander
Rozhenko
Worf
Rozhenko

Sarek

Sarek
Hoshi
Sato
Montgomery
Scott

Scotty

Seska
Seven
of Nine

Shran

Silik
Benjamin
Lafayette Sisko
Jake
Sisko
Doctor
Noonien Soong
Ambassador
Soval

Spock

Spock
Hikaru
Sulu
Hikaru
Sulu

Surak
B'Elanna
Torres

T'Pau

T'Pol
Deanna
Troi
Lwaxana
Troi
Charles
Tucker III

Tuvok
Nyota
Uhura
Nyota
Uhura

Weyoun
Winn
Adami
Natasha
Yar
Additional
People
Crew
Manifests
The Original
Series
The Next
Generation
Deep
Space Nine

Voyager

Enterprise
Star Trek XI
Enterprise
ReviewImagesDatapointsQuotes
TimelinePreviousNextYour View

Business as Usual

Review

Series : Deep Space Nine Rating : 2
Disc No : 5.5 Episode : 115
First Aired : 7 Apr 1997 Stardate : Unknown
Director : Siddig el Fadil Year : 2373
Writers : Bradley Thompson, David Weddle Season : 5
Guest Cast :
Eric Cadora as Customer
Josh Pais as Gaila
Lawrence Tierney as Regent of Palamar
Steven Berkoff as Hagath
Tim Halligan as Farrakk
YATI : Quark claims he hasn't had a single Starfleet customer all week. Yet we saw O'Brien and Bashir playing darts a couple of scenes ago.

Quark is very resistant to the idea of selling weapons in this episode, and everybody treats him as a pariah for doing so. But back in The Maquis, he arranged an arms deal for Sakonna with no hesitation, no problems, and no fallout.

Factoid : Gaila's speech to Quark about "putting out one of those lights" (meaning stars) is heavily based on Orson Welles' speech in the movie "The Third Man".

The Breen weapon Quark demonstrates is a "CRM-114"; this is a reference to the radio encoding device employed by the B-52 bombers in the Stanley Kubrick movie "Dr. Strangelove", which was also a CRM-114.

This was the first episode directed by Alexander Siddig/Siddig el Fadil, aka Dr. Bashir. He is reportedly quite satisfied with how it turned out.

It's also one of the very favourite episodes of Armin Shimerman, who plays Quark. Shimmerman was one of the first actors ever to play a Ferengi in TNG season 1, and was long disappointed with the very poor way the race turned out as a threat, and their subsequent relegation to comic relief. Throughout Deep Space Nine he resisted playing Quark purely for laughs, and was delighted that this episode gave the character a serious problem for him to play out. He was also pleased with the way Alexander Siddig directed, since he was very open to accepting suggestions for how Quark should be played.

Guest star Lawrence Tierney suffered a stroke shortly before this episode began filming. Although he could deliver his lines just fine, he had great difficulty remembering any of them. Each line had to be read to him right before he said them, with the resulting snippets cut together afterwards.






Plotline

Quark is deep in debt after being black balled by the Ferengi Commerce Authority. His cousin Gaila offers him lucrative business as an arms dealer - but the moral implications turn out to be deeper than Quark had realised.

Analysis

I'm a little unhappy with this episode. Everybody acts as though selling weapons is an inherently immoral thing, and Quark is automatically in the wrong to do so.

Starfleet is an oddity in that they seem to build their own equipment - we see places like Utopia Planitia, where the ships are built, which are apparently staffed by Starfleet staff. So it may be that Starfleet never has to buy weapons from anybody, since they apparently just build their own. But is that really the difference that the moral disdain is based on? Is their condemnation of Quark really that his clients are purchasing weapons rather than building their own? It seems unlikely.

Rather, the episode seems to be making the argument that simply owning weapons of warfare is wrong. This on a station that is so heavily armed that it can hold off an entire Klingon battle fleet all by itself... attended by one of the most powerful warships in the entire Alpha Quadrant... staffed by a crew that regularly carry hand weapons on missions. Why is it right for Sisko to carry a phaser rifle around, but wrong for Quark's clients to do so?

Of course, the episode tries to simplify this issue for us by making out that all of Quark's customers are Bad People who want to fight wars of aggression with mass civilian casualties. But this is an absurdity, written in purely so that the situation becomes an artificial one in which the "selling weapons is bad" message works. Notice that at no point in the episode does anybody so much as suggest that it is the nature of Quark's customers that is the problem, mind - the fact that Quark dealt in weapons at all is simply assumed to automatically put him in the wrong.

Ask yourself what if some planet on the Cardassian border was terrified by the Dominion takeover there, and wanted to up-gun their defence forces? Would everyone on the station still be condemning Quark for helping such a planet? Or for that matter, consider that Hagath sold weapons to the Bajorans during the occupation. Would Sisko and Dax have come down on him for providing the Bajorans with the means to resist a tyrannical force of occupation?

It's a shame, too, because it would be an easy fix. They already spend time having the characters discuss the morality of the situation. They could easily have noted that Hagath was known only for supplying weapons to "bad guys" who nobody else would supply or something. Instead, the message here seems to be nothing more than "selling guns is bad and you shouldn't do it".
Copyright Graham Kennedy Page views : 14,267 Last updated : 24 May 2017