Search
Cookie Usage Statistics Colour Key Sudden Death Monthly Poll Caption Comp eMail Author Shops
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum
The Original Series The Next Generation Deep Space Nine Voyager Enterprise Discovery Picard Strange New Worlds The Animated Series Lower Decks Prodigy Films List The Motion Picture The Wrath of Khan The Search for Spock The Voyage Home The Final Frontier Undiscovered Country Generations First Contact Insurrection Nemesis Star Trek Star Trek Into Darkness Star Trek Beyond Encyclopedia Chronology TOS Tech Manual TNG Tech Manual DS9 Tech Manual TNG Companion DS9 Companion VOY Companion The Klingon Dictionary Mr Scott's Guide Inside Star Trek The Art of Star Trek Star Charts TOS Nitpickers TNG Nitpickers DS9 Nitpickers Quotable Star Trek Gods of Night Mere Mortals Lost Souls Taking Wing The Red King Orion's Hounds Sword of Damocles Over a Torrent Sea Synthesis Fallen Gods Harbinger Summon The Thunder Reap The Whirlwind Open Secrets All books Games Episode statistics Actor statistics Writer statistics Director statistics Rating system

Second Sight

ReviewImagesDatapointsQuotesMorals
TimelinePreviousNextYour View
Series :
Season Ep :
2 x 09
Title :
Second Sight
Rating :
0
Overall Ep :
28
First Aired :
21 Nov 1993
Stardate :
47329.4
Director :
Year :
Writers :
Your Rating :
0.5000 for 2 reviews
Reviewer : Hattix Rating : 1
Review : Aha, the typical DS9 stinker. I think Graham's a bit harsh on it with his 0 rating, but not far from the truth. It's not bad or awful, just boring. The story doesn't go anywhere, the writing's not convincing, it's just DS9 going through the motions. The easily-played token mad scientist doesn't even come off well. Not necessarily one to avoid, but hardly great entertainment.
Reviewer : BJH Rating : 0
Review : Awful episode. The basic premise of the story is mediocre at best, and the production does not improve on it in the slightest. The 'twist' at the end, such as it is, is ineffective and downright stupid, and the scientist comitting suicide is as believable as a lieutenant being in command of a Nebula class starship in a time of peace. Nit: Sisko gives the stardate as 47329.4 and says it is the 4th anniversary of Wolf 359. Eh? The Battle of Wolf 359 occured on and around stardate 44001 (Best of Both Worlds, Pt II). Therefore, not only is the anniversary four months late, it's a year ahead. Stardate 47001 would be the THIRD anniversary of the battle, not the fourth.
Add your own review

© Graham & Ian Kennedy Page views : 6,935 Last updated : 24 Apr 2024